JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 23, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Laura Moreno Restrepo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuanto el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica formulado contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación constató que el rechazo se encontraba justificado y procedió a CONFIRMAR en su integridad el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del 5 de diciembre de 2018, proferido por la magistrada Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual rechazó la demanda interpuesta por la ciudadana Laura Moreno Restrepo contra el artículo 8 (parcial) de la Ley 1480 de 2011, "Por medio de la cual se expide el Estatuto del Consumidor y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General, COMUNÍQUESE el contenido de esta decisión a la demandante, advirtiendo que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Una vez quede ejecutoriado el presente auto, ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.